Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Safety of artemether-lumefantrine exposure in first trimester of pregnancy: an observational cohort
Authors: Mosha, Dominic
Mazuguni, Festo
Mrema, Sigilbert
Sevene, Esperança
Abdulla, Salim
Genton, Blaise
Keywords: Pregnancy
Maternal health
Issue Date: 27-Mar-2014
Publisher: BioMed Central
Citation: Mosha, D., Mazuguni, F., Mrema, S. et al. Safety of artemether-lumefantrine exposure in first trimester of pregnancy: an observational cohort. Malar J 13, 197 (2014).
Abstract: Background: There is limited data available regarding safety profile of artemisinins in early pregnancy. They are, therefore, not recommended by WHO as a first-line treatment for malaria in first trimester due to associated embryo-foetal toxicity in animal studies. The study assessed birth outcome among pregnant women inadvertently exposed to artemether-lumefantrine (AL) during first trimester in comparison to those of women exposed to other anti-malarial drugs or no drug at all during the same period of pregnancy. Methods: Pregnant women with gestational age <20 weeks were recruited from Maternal Health clinics or from monthly house visits (demographic surveillance), and followed prospectively until delivery. Results: 2167 pregnant women were recruited and 1783 (82.3%) completed the study until delivery. 319 (17.9%) used anti-malarials in first trimester, of whom 172 (53.9%) used (AL), 78 (24.4%) quinine, 66 (20.7%) sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and 11 (3.4%) amodiaquine. Quinine exposure in first trimester was associated with an increased risk of miscarriage/stillbirth (OR 2.5; 1.3–5.1) and premature birth (OR 2.6; 1.3–5.3) as opposed to AL with (OR 1.4; 0.8–2.5) for miscarriage/stillbirth and (OR 0.9; 0.5–1.8) for preterm birth. Congenital anomalies were identified in 4 exposure groups namely AL only (1/164[0.6%]), quinine only (1/70[1.4%]), SP (2/66[3.0%]), and non-anti-malarial exposure group (19/1464[1.3%]). Conclusion: Exposure to AL in first trimester was more common than to any other anti-malarial drugs. Quinine exposure was associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes which was not the case following other anti-malarial intake. Since AL and quinine were used according to their availability rather than to disease severity, it is likely that the effect observed was related to the drug and not to the disease itself. Even with this caveat, a change of policy from quinine to AL for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria during the whole pregnancy period could be already envisaged.
URI: Aberto
Appears in Collections:Artigos Publicados em Revistas Cientificas - FAMED

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2018 - Sevene, Esperança.pdf1.8 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.