DSpace Repository

Research ethics review at University Eduardo Mondlane (UEM)/Maputo Central Hospital, Mozambique (2013–2016): a descriptive analysis of the start-up of a new research ethics committee (REC)

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sacarlal, Jahit
dc.contributor.author Muchanga, Vasco
dc.contributor.author Mabutana, Carlos
dc.contributor.author Mabui, Matilde
dc.contributor.author Mariamo, Arlete
dc.contributor.author Cuamba, Assa Júlio
dc.contributor.author Fumo, Leida Artur
dc.contributor.author Silveira, Jacinta
dc.contributor.author Heitman, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.author Silveira, Jacinta
dc.contributor.author Moon, Troy D.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-20T11:01:09Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-20T11:01:09Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.other https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12910-018-0291-4
dc.identifier.uri http://www.repositorio.uem.mz/handle258/958
dc.description.abstract Background: Mozambique has seen remarkable growth in biomedical research over the last decade. To meet a growing need, the National Committee for Bioethics in Health of Mozambique (CNBS) encouraged the development of ethical review processes at institutions that regularly conduct medical and social science research. In 2012, the Faculty of Medicine (FM) of University Eduardo Mondlane (UEM) and the Maputo Central Hospital (MCH) established a joint Institutional Committee on Bioethics for Health (CIBS FM & MCH). This study examines the experience of the first 4 years of the CIBS FM & MCH. Methods: This study provides a descriptive, retrospective analysis of research protocols submitted to and approved by the CIBS FM & MCH between March 1, 2013 and December 31, 2016, together with an analysis of the Committee’s respective reviews and actions. Results: A total of 356 protocols were submitted for review during the period under analysis, with 309 protocols approved. Sixty-four percent were submitted by students, faculty, and researchers from UEM, mainly related to Master’s degree research (42%). Descriptive cross-sectional studies were the most frequently reviewed research (61%). The majority were prospective (71%) and used quantitative methodologies (51%). The Departments of Internal Medicine at MCH and Community Health at the FM submitted the most protocols from their respective institutions, with 38 and 53% respectively. The CIBS’s average time to final approval for all protocols was 56 days, rising to 161 for the 40 protocols that required subsequent national-level review by the CNBS. Conclusions: Our results show that over its first 4 years, the CIBS FM & MCH has been successful in managing a constant demand for protocol review and that several broad quality improvement initiatives, such as investigator mentoring and an electronic protocol submission platform have improved efficiency in the review process and the overall quality of the protocols submitted. Beyond Maputo, long-term investments in training and ethical capacity building for CIBS across the country continue to be needed, as Mozambique develops greater capacity for research and makes progress toward improving the health of all its citizens. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher BMC en_US
dc.rights openAcess en_US
dc.subject Ethics en_US
dc.subject Research ethics review en_US
dc.subject Research ethics committee en_US
dc.subject Low-and middle-income country en_US
dc.subject Mozambique en_US
dc.title Research ethics review at University Eduardo Mondlane (UEM)/Maputo Central Hospital, Mozambique (2013–2016): a descriptive analysis of the start-up of a new research ethics committee (REC) en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.journal BMC Medical Ethics en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account