DSpace Repository

Language policy and planning processes in post-colonial Timor-Leste: struggles and alliances within and across scales

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Chimbutane, Feliciano
dc.date.accessioned 2024-03-21T12:00:44Z
dc.date.available 2024-03-21T12:00:44Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.other https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10993-020-09564-y
dc.identifier.uri http://www.repositorio.uem.mz/handle258/865
dc.description.abstract The aim of this Afterword is to foreground and discuss some of the key themes emerging from the four studies in this special issue. I first consider the critical eth- nographic approach to language policy and planning adopted in the studies, and the attention to language policy processes unfolding on different scales of social and institutional life. This is followed by my reading of the ways the authors present the different actors creating, appropriating, reframing or resisting national and lan- guage-in-education policies in Timor-Leste. The last part is devoted to the analysis of discourses and practices of particular social actors taken here as ‘language policy arbiters’ (Johnson and Johnson in Lang Policy 14(3):221–243, 2015). en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher Springer en_US
dc.rights openAcess en_US
dc.subject Language policy and planning en_US
dc.subject Language-in-education policies en_US
dc.subject Post- colonial en_US
dc.subject Timor-Leste en_US
dc.subject Scales en_US
dc.title Language policy and planning processes in post-colonial Timor-Leste: struggles and alliances within and across scales en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.description.resumo O objetivo deste posfácio é destacar e discutir alguns dos principais temas emergentes dos quatro estudos desta edição especial. Primeiro considero a ética crítica abordagem nográfica da política e planejamento linguístico adotada nos estudos, e a atenção aos processos de política linguística que se desenrolam em diferentes escalas sociais e vida institucional. Isto é seguido pela minha leitura das formas como os autores apresentam os diferentes atores criando, apropriando-se, reenquadrando ou resistindo a políticas de avaliação na educação em Timor-Leste. A última parte é dedicada à análise de discursos e práticas de determinados atores sociais tomados aqui como “políticas linguísticas”. árbitros’ (Johnson e Johnson em Lang Policy 14(3):221–243, 2015).(TRADUÇÃO NOSSA) en_US
dc.journal Language Policy en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account