DSpace Repository

Validating sea-level altimetry data against tide gauge for coastal risk analysis in Mozambique

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Nehama, Fialho P.J.
dc.contributor.author Veriua, Zeinul Dufa Hassane
dc.contributor.author Maueua, Clousa
dc.contributor.author Hibbert, Angela
dc.contributor.author Calafat, Francisco
dc.contributor.author Cotton, Peter David
dc.date.accessioned 2022-11-11T12:12:33Z
dc.date.available 2022-11-11T12:12:33Z
dc.date.issued 2022-10-29
dc.identifier.citation Nehama, F.P.J.; Veriua, Z.D.H.; Hibbert, A.; Maueua, C.; Calafat, F.; Cotton, P.D. Validating Sea-Level Altimetry Data against Tide Gauge for Coastal Risk Analysis in Mozambique. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1597. https://doi. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://www.repositorio.uem.mz/handle258/712
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher MDPI en_US
dc.rights openAcess en_US
dc.subject Sea level en_US
dc.subject Coastal risk en_US
dc.subject Satellite altimetry en_US
dc.subject Algorithm en_US
dc.subject ALES re-tracker en_US
dc.title Validating sea-level altimetry data against tide gauge for coastal risk analysis in Mozambique en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.description.resumo Satellite altimetry data provide a solution to the lack of in situ tide gauge data, which are essential for comprehending various marine processes worldwide. In the present study, we seek to validate ALES-retrieved sea-level data against tide gauge observations from four ground stations on the coast of Mozambique. The approach consisted of extracting data from selected tracks of the Jason-1, Jason-2 and Jason-3 missions, and processing it to (i) remove outliers, (ii) collocate alongside tide gauge data, (iii) remove the tidal component and detrend, and (iv) perform a set of statistical analyses. Good agreement was found between the altimetry and tide gauge data in three of the four stations (Maputo, r = 0.59; Inhambane, r = 0.87; and Pemba, r = 0.75), with the exception of Beira. The annual and semi-annual cycles in the two datasets revealed that the altimetry signal is smaller in amplitude and ahead (with a few exceptions) of tide gauge by a varying number of days in each location. Both the annual and semi-annual cycles are far more comparable in Pemba, where the amplitude in particular has the same order of magnitude, followed by the Maputo station. The study concluded that the selected altimetry data for Pemba and Maputo stations are valid and can be used for coastal risk analysis and other applications. No altimetry data could be validated for Inhambane and Beira stations due to lack of consistent and sufficiently long tide gauge records. This difficulty urges the need for improved maintenance practices of ground stations located near human settlements that rely on sound information of the sea level and its variability to protect lives, infrastructure and livelihoods. en_US
dc.journal Journal of Marine Science and Engineering en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account